We must not fail WikiLeaks whistleblower Bradley Manning

submit to reddit

Bradley Manning Support Network steering committee member Kevin Zeese, who observed Bradley’s plea statement in the courtroom at Fort Meade, MD, writes about what he saw, the importance of Bradley’s statement, and how we can help the young whistleblower before time runs out.

By Kevin Zeese. March 3, 2013.

Releasing the documents to WikiLeaks was an act of conscience.

Releasing the documents to WikiLeaks was an act of conscience.

As I sat in court last Thursday at Fort Meade, watching Bradley Manning take responsibility as the Wikileaks whistleblower, two things struck me: (1) his thorough intelligence fueled by intellectual curiosity and (2) his empathy for other people when so many in war had lost their humanity.

This was the second time I had heard Manning testify. The first was his testimony about the abusive pre-trial incarceration he suffered for one year while being held in a cage in Kuwait and in solitary confinement in the Quantico Brig.  I’ve now seen him testify for a total of 15 hours.

His testimony leads me to wonder: what would have happened to Bradley Manning if we had a decent educational system that included affordable, preferably free, college education so that young people weren’t driven to the military for economic reasons? What could Bradley Manning have given the country if he had been able to pursue his interests and natural talents? Would Manning have joined the military if the country was honest about how the US Empire operates around the world?

But, that was not to be.  The country failed Bradley Manning.

I hope we do not fail him again.

Manning made it clear last Thursday that he leaked the documents to Wikileaks because he saw serious problems in US foreign policy. Problems which are as serious as they can be: war crimes, criminal behavior at the highest levels up to Secretary of State Clinton, unethical behavior and bullying of other nations.

Manning’s sole purpose was to “spark a domestic debate on the role of the military and our foreign policy in general.”* He hoped the debate “might cause society to reevaluate the need or even the desire to engage in counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations that ignore the complex dynamics of the people living in the effected environment every day.”

Regarding the collateral murder video which showed civilians, including two Reuters journalists being massacred, he said “I hoped that the public would be as alarmed as me about the conduct of the aerial weapons team crew members. I wanted the American public to know that not everyone in Iraq and Afghanistan are targets that needed to be neutralized, but rather people who were struggling to live in the pressure cooker environment of what we call asymmetric warfare.”

When discussing the State Department cables Manning saw that the US was not behaving the way the “de facto leader of the free world” should act as the cables “documented backdoor deals and seemingly criminal activity.” Again, he hoped for a change in policy as the “cables were a prime example of a need for a more open diplomacy” that would avoid conflict and save lives.

Bradley Manning reading his plea statement in court, sketched by Clark Stoeckley of the Bradley Manning Support Network.

Bradley Manning reading his plea statement in court, sketched by Clark Stoeckley of the Bradley Manning Support Network.

In some of these statements you get a hint of Manning’s empathy for fellow human beings. The incident that really showed it was his comments on David Frankel’s book “The Good Soldier,” where Frankel describes a seriously injured Iraqi civilian on the ground at the end of the Collateral Murder video. He lifts two fingers toward the soldier, a well-known sign of friendship, as he asks for help. The US soldier responds lifting his middle finger as the Iraqi died. Manning puts himself in the place of the Iraqi thinking his final act was an act of friendship only to be returned by a crude obscenity of unfriendliness. Manning acknowledges that this “burdens me emotionally.”

Manning was clear that he was solely responsible for his actions saying “The decisions that I made to send documents and information to the WLO [Wikileaks Organization] and website were my own decisions, and I take full responsibility for my actions.”  He described his conversations with an anonymous person at Wikileaks but made it quite clear there was no espionage conspiracy between Manning and Julian Assange.  His statement made it much more difficult for the US to prosecute Assange under the Espionage Act.

There is no question that Manning will spend years in jail.  The ten charges he pled guilty to last week each carry two years for a total potential of 20 years incarceration. The government has announced it will still prosecute the espionage and aiding the enemy charges which could lead to a life sentence. This is an abuse of government power.  They may be able to prove their case, but that does not mean he is truly guilty of those crimes, if convicted it will be another example of laws written to favor the prosecution; another example of injustice in today’s United States.

Judge Denise Lind has beautiful judicial decorum in court and shows she is on top of the details of the proceedings and the law.  She is an impressive judicial figure but so far when there have been disputes between Manning and the government she has tended to split the difference, always giving a little more to the government. She has served in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps for 25 years, four as a judge.  She is a product of a system that does not blow the whistle, does not go outside the chain of command and views following orders as a way of life. She will do what she thinks is just when she considers Manning’s case, but I doubt it will seem like justice to those of us who support Manning.

How can we avoid failing Bradley Manning? Ongoing support through the Bradley Manning Support Network continues to be essential but more than that, we need to do what we can to disseminate the information he leaked and work to create a national debate on a foreign policy that is seriously off-track.

This will be a long term effort, and as we pursue that work, we should never forget the young man who put his life and liberty on the line to give the world a glimpse of US foreign policy, a person who was failed by a country that talks about its concern for the young but does not do enough for them. Now, it is our job to pick up the materials Bradley has provided and work to create the better world we urgently need and he sought in his own patriotic way.

* All quotations are taken from the transcript of Manning’s testimony prepared by Alexa O’Brien as the court has not released his written statement to the public.

Kevin Zeese is an attorney who serves on the steering committee of the Bradley Manning Support Network. He also serves a co-director of It’s Our Economy. His twitter is @KBZeese.

8 thoughts on “We must not fail WikiLeaks whistleblower Bradley Manning

  1. I am a French writer, aged 72. I am a retired LtCol in the French Army. I support Bradley Manning because he has done what any soldier should do, whatever their rank, when the country they are fighting for swerves from the ideals it stands for. I have taken a course with the US Army. I have worked with the US Army. I have the highest regard for the U.S.A. I am deeply grateful to the USA for freeing my country from Nazi occupation. What Bradley Manning has denounced is unacceptable and does not tally with my idea of America. He has done the right thing, as a man, as a citizen, as a soldier. I would be proud to shake his hand. He is a young man, a brave man, his life must not be spent in prison. I offer myself to spend one year of my life in prison in his stead.

  2. American democracy and freedom of speech at it’s best!
    Collateral damage is what they term for their war crimes!


  4. Please note : I have put up a petition on avaaz.org squarely addressing the disgusting treatment of Bradley Manning and seeking support for his nomination for a Nobel Peace Prize.

    We only need to get massive support on the internet (even if he does not win) and the corrupt US government politically just cannot gaol Bradley - the hero of all of the decent people worldwide who now make their voices heard.

    The petition is entitled “Prosecute the Murderers, not the Messenger. Save Bradley Manning. give him the Nobel Peace Prize.”

  5. The whole thing is an extraordinary abuse of government power - they have subjected Bradley to over 1000 days of inhumane treatment, but they have not broken him !! He won’t lie to implicate Assange & save himself & he sticks unwaveringly to his simple message of humanity - big respect to this man !!!

  6. The millet hairy in dust real complex is manufactured from the social in dust real complex…the command structure for recruitment is a social complex between the reality of private union and the perception of public union. Recruitment begins at birth, not at adult age when a person signs a contract to join a military force with a right to kill the enemy. In films like die hard 1, 2,3,4,5 points in a pentagon, the message is the good guy is immortal and the bad guys fall like toy sold yours. Mortality is a global copyright, not a private psychological top down tool in the monopolisation of motivations.
    The right to kill raises questions about the validity and authenticity of the civilian right and the human right, the state of the union, the common good, the common wealth, the moral compass and the greater good. When Bradley Manning leaked news of atrocities to civilian persons in other nations, he did not break the chain of command in a Government of the people by the people, he represented it, he upheld it, he spoke the truth, he highlighted the fact, the command structure was corrupt for allowing such things to take place in his name and the American peoples name. If you’re a dwarf in an army with gods, playing Russian roulette for the casino tables of the financial wrong in the name of self-interest progress, your actions speak louder than war, when you speak the truth. It’s not Bradley Manning who should be on trial facing a long prison sentence at the tax payers’ expense; it’s the chain of command that should be on trial for committing the atrocities Bradley Manning exposed.
    Was the chain of command following the mission directive of the American people or the promises of the corporate sponsorship and secret payoffs? Why is there a Jew sponsor behind every elected official in American politics and Law, do they wear black because their funeral directors or they know something independent people don’t. Is the superpower in America or Israel…what is a superpower? Is BM a superpower for standing up for rule of law?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>