Update 7/24/12: Implications of Manning’s trial, rally at Ft. Leavenworth, government’s illogical secrecy

Bradley Manning at Ft. Meade. Photo by AFP.

Injustice for Manning is injustice for the rest of us. Dan Lefcourt, in praising Bradley Manning as a whistle-blower, sees the unfair trial at Ft. Meade as a microcosm for the greater secrecy problems with the United States at large:

If wrongdoing was being committed and he was witness to it, it was his moral duty to reveal it. The crime would have been if he had seen it and not reported it he would have been complicit in covering it up.

Like Daniel Ellsberg, the government whistleblower of the “Pentagon Papers”, who revealed the government’s lies on the Viet Nam war and was thoroughly exonerated from any wrongdoing, the same justice should occur for Bradley Manning.

Though some rabid right wing nuts would prefer to see Manning executed as a traitor for “aiding the enemy” with his alleged leaking of documents to WikiLeaks, Manning’s conviction would be a supreme injustice showing the U.S. moral decay and decline into an all powerful national security state, a global hegemon interested in hiding the truth, exercising military dominance and secrecy at any cost.

Clearly, Bradley’s trial holds great implications for whistle-blowers and transparency to come. (Read more…)

Activists rally for Bradley Manning at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. PressTV interviews CodePink’s Lisa Savage, who was among supporters demonstrating for Bradley Manning where he’s being detained in Ft. Leavenworth.

 Judge rules government is allowed to continue pretending publicly available documents are still secret. The ruling comes in response to a FOIA request by the ACLU, who explained why the ruling is so logically flawed:

The cables we requested reveal the diplomatic harms of widely criticized U.S. government policies, including torture, detention and rendition of detainees, detention at Guantanamo, and the use of drones to carry out targeted killings. The State Department claims that the withheld cables are classified, and thus so secret that they cannot be released—despite the fact that they are already accessible to anyone in the world with an internet connection and a passing interest in current events.

The ACLU’s Nathan Freed Wessler continues, on why the ruling is so pernicious:

…under the logic of the court’s ruling today, every time you uncover the government’s “secret” text, you are somehow causing harm to national security. This argument just doesn’t hold up, as detailed in this New York Times article from last December. Whatever damage to the reputation of the United States may have occurred when the cables were first disclosed, no more harm can come from releasing identical text of the cables again now. In fact, it is the court’s ruling that causes harm, by frustrating the Freedom of Information Act’s promise of transparency and making a mockery of the concept of legitimate secrecy.

The fact that FOIA requests are met with this type of illogical secrecy makes another ruling even harder to swallow: the government’s claim that it need not provide public transcripts or documents from Bradley Manning’s trial because the public and press can access them with FOIA requests. (Read more…)

3 thoughts on “Update 7/24/12: Implications of Manning’s trial, rally at Ft. Leavenworth, government’s illogical secrecy

  1. I believed in my government, that, we as a country were righteous. How bitterly disappointed I am in those we have entrusted with our lives. They have used the power we gave them to increase the human misery and suffering throughout the world. We love you Bradley Manning. You are one of our superheroes…stay strong.

  2. One Day it will End , Bradley manning Has certainly gotten the atention of a lot of fools thinking hes Guilty of something and an even larger number thinking he will somehow get sympathy from public opinion , The Military is made up of Cruel and Unusualy Sick indavidules that seek revenge at every level and spare no amount to cover up and hide any truth in there quest to please there superiors …It is factualy corect to say there is no such thing as Military justice . only the Vengefull unjust decesions handed out by there Military apointed Court with no regard for truth or Fair justice……Frank Blackstone

  3. Another exampl ;e of a state more concerned with silencing those who would reveal unpalatable truths and the abuse of power than with human rights and justice for the people

Leave a Reply to Devorah Marks Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>